If you've spent time in trading communities you've seen the debate: is SMC just price action with fancy names? Is price action too vague to be tradable? The honest answer is that price action and Smart Money Concepts overlap heavily — they're not competing methodologies so much as different vocabularies for reading the same market. But they do call for slightly different journaling, and understanding the difference matters for your analytics.
Price action is the broad discipline of reading raw price movement to make decisions. Support and resistance, trends, breakouts, pullbacks, candlestick structure, supply and demand zones — all of it sits under the price action umbrella. If you trade off a clean chart with no indicators and make decisions from how price behaves at levels, you're a price action trader.
The advantage of "price action" as a label is reach: a huge number of traders self-identify this way, and the analytics questions are universal — which setups win, in which sessions, under which emotional state.
Smart Money Concepts (SMC) is a more specific framework that uses precise labels for institutional behaviour: Order Blocks, Fair Value Gaps, Breaker Blocks, Liquidity Grabs, BOS, CHOCH. An SMC trader is still fundamentally a price action trader — they're reading price, not indicators — but they use a defined vocabulary and look for a defined set of patterns.
ICT (Inner Circle Trader) is even more prescriptive, adding Kill Zones, Optimal Trade Entry, the Power of 3 model, and liquidity engineering on top of the same raw price action.
The good news: you don't need two journals. A well-built journal supports both simultaneously.
If you trade generic price action, your minimum journaling is: setup type (support bounce, breakout retest, pullback, etc.), session, HTF bias, emotion, and R-multiple outcome.
If you trade SMC/ICT, you add the SMC confluence tags — Order Block, FVG, Liquidity Sweep, BOS, CHOCH, Kill Zone — on top of the same session, bias, emotion, and R fields.
Many traders are hyphenated: "price action with SMC confluence." Your journal should let you tag a single trade with both a generic price action setup and the SMC confluence that framed it. Over time the analytics tell you whether the SMC framing actually improved your results or whether the generic price action read was sufficient.
Both camps need the same headline number: expectancy in R per trade. Whether you call your entry a "support bounce" or a "bullish Order Block retest," what matters is the honest, calculated R expectancy of your setups over 100+ trades.
A journal that only tracks dollars or pips can't answer that question. R-normalised expectancy is the great equaliser — it lets a price action trader and an SMC trader compare edges on the same yardstick.
CoreEdge strategy tags are open-ended: you can tag a trade as "Breakout Retest" or as "Order Block + FVG confluence" — or both on the same trade. Session, HTF bias, emotion, and automatic R-multiple calculation apply identically. The analytics then break your performance down by whatever you tagged.
The lesson: don't agonise over whether to call yourself a price action trader or an SMC trader. Tag what you actually see, track the R, and let the data tell you where your real edge lives.
Start journaling free — no credit card required.
CoreEdge is a trading journal for SMC, ICT, Forex, and Futures traders. Free plan available.
Get Started Free →